Hello. On 18.02.19 07:07, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Morning Simon, > > What I am thinking is the master branch would have the weekly releases for > developers and stable releases would be once a month.
No, sorry. I don't think that makes sense. We don't need a tarball packaged from git without any extra work. People who want bleeding edge stay on git. If we would provide snapshots people would expect some extra testing on them which would simply not happen. > What do you think about this? I think we should stick with what we talked about and not mix in other things every day. 1) Try a 5 months release schedule to see if that works better and lifts some pressure form the 3 months cycle. 2) For stable updates we will have a cron job running that checks every Monday if there are new patches in the stable branches compared to the last stable update. If there are we trigger the process to do a new release. In practice that would mean we do it really "on-demand", as in, some fix was seen worthwhile backporting. I would imagine that will give us weekly updates for the first few weeks after a major release and after that only occasionally an update. regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
