On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:14:08 +0100 Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking just to tidy things up I might put the engage module in > e_modules in case anyone wants to fix it up after the gadman removal. I welcome the move, and so long as devilhorns agrees, I say go for it. If I have time for it before anybody else gets to it, I'll fix up the gadman issue myself. For the moment I still have .desktop stuff to keep me busy. > Engage standalone is something I hope to have a minute for now and > then so I will separate the two. I thought standalone was deprecated? Hmm, this will fork the engage codebase. Was there much shared code between the two?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
