On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

ok- looking at the patch gives me meat to chew on :) overall this looks good.
i'm a little dubious of the whole libtool version thing - i actually HATE it.
i'd prefer the libtool revision/version/whatever stuff is sourced/generated
from the package itself (eg 0.5.0 for edje) and we will increment this ONE
version info only. i know what major and minor versions mean - most developers
do/should so i'd rather have a single version tag there if possible - all the
space used up by the libtool scheme comments could work on some script mojo to
work out the libtool version magic from the package version. i really want to
keep them consistent at all times if possible. thats my only issue - otherwise
it seems ok to me.

anyone else want to chime in?

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Michael Jennings wrote:
> 
> > Most of that sounds fine, but why not provide us with a sample
> > configure.in with examples of all 5 changes made to it so we can get a
> > more concrete idea of what you're wanting to do?  Then if people have
> > any specific objections, they're easier to note.
> 
> I've attached a patch for (for instance) edje, that shows the 
> modifications I want to do.
> 
> I've put the libtool doc about its versioning, but it's not necessary to 
> include it in configure.in.
> 
> so, what is good ? what is not correct ?
> 
> Vincent


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to