Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey > > I have 2 qestions about ecore_path: > > 1) about ecore_path_group_new, the documentation says that if an error > occured, then 0 is returned. But I see a "return -1;" Shouldn't the > function return 0 instead ? Also, if ecore_list_new return NULL, shouldn't > we also return an error (0 or -1, according to the convention used...) ?
This is an error, efl should return 0 on error. > > 2) in __ecore_path_group_find_id, there is no check to see if id is > positive or not (or non negative, if the error is -1). Is it normal ? Why do you need to check the id? If it is negative you wont find a group. Unnecessary looping, but no error. Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
