On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:00:02 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

... actually - you want both. e_entry wraps e_editable. e_editable is a raw
bit of text that can be edited - it has no entry box/decoration/background. so
you want to emit a disabled state to the entry ANd disable the editable smart
too :)


> On Jan 17, 2008 6:13 PM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:00:28 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri:
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 17, 2008 3:44 PM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Am Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:57:56 -0300 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 6:16 PM, Adriano Rezende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 3:03 PM, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:44:40 -0300 schrieb Adriano Rezende:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I believe you have to emit the signal to
> > > > > > > > sd->editable_object->text_object
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Search for the following code in your e_entry.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > | sd->editable_object = o;
> > > > > > > > | e_editable_theme_set(o, "base/theme/widgets",
> > > > > > > > "e/widgets/entry");
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > and follow the method e_editable_theme_set.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I just took a fast look at the code, so I recommend to test
> > > > > > > > before.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for that hint. I did a better patch and it works now. I
> > > > > > > think the visual improvement is really nice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://tux-style.de/tmp/tclock_deactivated_gray.png
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now users could see that a text entry is deactivated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've created a new bug entry about that topic:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://bugzilla.enlightenment.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review the patch if possible. Commit it or allow me to
> > > > > > > commit if the patch looks good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, I don't work on this project.
> > > > > > But probably the owner will see the patch and apply the changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Andreas,
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch looks really small and yes, maybe applied by raster one he
> > > > > have the time to check.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I'm not used to E code, just found something weird with the
> > > > > existing code:
> > > > >
> > > > >     edje_object_signal_emit(entry, "e,state,enabled", "e");
> > > >
> > > > Ok, as you noticed correct it was there before my modifications.
> > > >
> > > > > since entry is not (at least looks like it's not) an Edje object,
> > > > > this will have no effect due defensive programming,
> > > > > edje_object_signal_emit() will find no "Edje *" with
> > > > > "_edje_fetch(obj)" and then will return.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just noticed that because I think the signal should be sent to
> > > > > sd->entry_object, not sd->editable_object, it would allow us even
> > > > > to set a clipper and make it transparent, thus disabled items
> > > > > could be semi-transparent! :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > If I'm right and the above code is bogus, then it's just a matter
> > > > > of using sd->entry_object instead of entry, add the theme part
> > > > > and we're done.
> > > >
> > > > I think my patch looks good so far. Not sure about the yet existing
> > > > code.
> > > >
> > > > Please one of the E developers should give me the ok for commit the
> > > > patch. I'll to create some more theme patches in the future and
> > > > like to know if it's ok this way.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but if I'm correct and the existing code is wrong, then your
> > > patch is useless.
> >
> > Perhaps there's a wrong understanding. Do you say it was wrong before?
> > Then my patch does even not take it worse. And the result is as desired
> > if you look at the screenshot that I attached to the bug report.
> 
> I'm saying that current code (already commited, in CVS) looks like it
> was trying to do that, but it is wrong and thus is not working. If the
> code is fixed and it should work without any patch to _code_ (but we
> still require the theme patch, modified).
> 
> I'm talking about e_entry.c line 294:
> 
>     edje_object_signal_emit(entry, "e,state,enabled", "e");
> 
> entry is the smart object, not an edje file, so it is doing nothing
> (due defensive programming in edje_object_signal_emit(), check the
> code). If this code reads:
> 
>     edje_object_signal_emit(sd->entry_object, "e,state,enabled", "e");
> 
> and e/widgets/entry is changed (.edc), then it should work as you want.
> 
> Notes:
>   1) I'd use sd->entry_object instead of sd->editable_object because
> this would free us to do more things, since the editable_object is
> swallowed inside entry_object, thus we can do things like apply a
> clipper and change its color, graying it or even making it
> transparent.
>   2) I'd not add yet another API call to editable.
> 
> That's my understanding, what do you think about it?
> 
> -- 
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> --------------------------------------
> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   ICQ#: 17249123
>  Skype: gsbarbieri
> Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to