On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:21:56 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

> 
> Hey,
> 
> Cedric sent me his last version of his code to replace fn_match in edje 
> (see attachment).
> 
> As fnmatch is used in eet and evas too, and as fnmatch is not avaialble in 
> some platform, I would like to know if it would be a good idea to ave our 
> own implementation of the features of fnmatch we use in these 3 libraries.
> 
> If so, what about adding it in an existing library ?

so all we do is duplicate fnmatch for platforms too lame to have a shared glob
matching call? the idea of things like that is to save having to do it all
ourselves. if we can make it a LOT faster or a LOT more efficient, or a lot
of implementations are so buggy that we have to do our own - sure, but just for
the sake of re-implementing it for the few corner-case platforms that may not
have it natively?

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to