On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:01:49 +0100 "Cedric BAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Jan 19, 2008 2:20 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:21:56 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > As fnmatch is used in eet and evas too, and as fnmatch is not avaialble in > > > some platform, I would like to know if it would be a good idea to ave our > > > own implementation of the features of fnmatch we use in these 3 libraries. > > > > > > If so, what about adding it in an existing library ? > > > so all we do is duplicate fnmatch for platforms too lame to have a shared > > glob matching call? the idea of things like that is to save having to do it > > all ourselves. if we can make it a LOT faster or a LOT more efficient, or a > > lot of implementations are so buggy that we have to do our own - sure, but > > just for the sake of re-implementing it for the few corner-case platforms > > that may not have it natively? > > Well, I think we can do it better. In fact fnmatch only match one > pattern at a time, in edje and in eet we always want to check them all > and the automate doing it should not change to offen (Only when new > program, signal,... are added). So I think it should be possible to > have something faster and more portable. true. with eet it's pretty simple and not used very often. the edje matches can be used a LOT - though the majority are not globs - just string matches (actually one day we should take advantage of the fact that all the strings come from evas_stringshare_add - this means if 2 strings are the same, the will have the same pointer. there is NO need to do a strcmp at all. just if (str1 == str2) :)). > Right now, it's easy for me to duplicate my patch from edje and add it > to eet or/and evas. But it would be more efficient to share code > between them, adding it to edata for example and making edata a > dependecies of eet/evas/edje. It will be a little bit more complex for > me to do this, but it will be cleaner. So what solution did you > prefer, so I can write the matching patch :-) hmm. actually- don't worry. fnmatch in eet and evas are very rarely used. we won't win on complicating them. :/ > -- > Cedric BAIL > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
