On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:

>
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>>>> finally got to play with it. quite interesting. i tried it on some images i
>>>> have (animated):
>>>>
>>>> [  1:56PM ~/C/data/demo/e_anim_reflection ] du -sh .
>>>> 1.9M    .
>>>> [  1:55PM ~/e_codec ] ./encode out.erv
>>>> '/home/raster/C/data/demo/e_anim_reflection_big/e_%04d.png' 120 0
>>>> * file : /home/raster/C/data/demo/e_anim_reflection_big/e_0001.png
>>>> * file : /home/raster/C/data/demo/e_anim_reflection_big/e_0002.png
>>>> ...
>>>> [  1:56PM ~/e_codec ] ls out.erv
>>>> 4.4M out.erv
>>>>
>>>> double the size :/ :(
>
> I've just tried with those files. I did 3 tests:
>
> test1 : i frame intervall 120, size 427479 bytes
> test2 : i frame intervall  25, size 461301 bytes
> test3 : i frame intervall  10, size 512005 bytes
>
> the total size of the png files is 1538887 bytes, so with the 1st test,
> the size of the video is 22.7% of the size of the png's.

typo : 27.7%

Vincent

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to