Michael Jennings wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 February 2008, at 20:27:44 (+0100), > Kim Woelders wrote: > >> Would adding AC_DISABLE_STATIC in configure.in accomplish the same thing >> without having to change every single Makefile.am? > > No, as that would disable static *libraries* as opposed to just static > *modules*. The latter are useless, but the former aren't. :) > Aahh, yes of course, we are after all building a library here. But how many libraries are actually built? Assuming not many - maybe it would be easier (if possible) to revert the logic and add --tag=enable-static where needed in stead?
/Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
