On Friday, March 28 2008 08:39:16 Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I repeat what i said on irc, but unit tests are really needed for eet > > > and its future changes > > > > sure, but not needed for a 1.0.0 :) > > I agree for the alpha and beta releases, but it would be really nice > to have unit tests for the final 1.0.0 release. It can help catch > compatibility issues much earlier in the process.
Unit tests should be used throughout the process to catch issues *before* you release, not after. -sandalle -- Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/ http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
