On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:55:41 -0700 Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Friday, March 28 2008 08:39:16 Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I repeat what i said on irc, but unit tests are really needed for eet > > > > and its future changes > > > > > > sure, but not needed for a 1.0.0 :) > > > > I agree for the alpha and beta releases, but it would be really nice > > to have unit tests for the final 1.0.0 release. It can help catch > > compatibility issues much earlier in the process. > > Unit tests should be used throughout the process to catch issues *before* you > release, not after. that's what e is... one big unit test :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
