On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:15 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:25:05 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > Cedric BAIL wrote: > > > So here are some patch that should not break edje too much. > > > > > > 0001 and 0002: Replace call to snprintf by using memcpy or some kind of > > > itoa. > > > > Is this really worth while? Possibly a small speedup at the cost of > > considerably more and considerably uglier code?
I could perhaps clean a little bit the code, but using snprintf when only memcpy is really required slow thing down (around 5% of my time lost in snprintf, with modification 0.1% in memcpy and 1% in snprintf). It's definitively a win. A minimal one, but a win. > i've reverted them anyway.. b0rks. :( I believe only 0004 should be risky, the other shouldn't be risky. But as it break illumine. I should try it. Do you have a tarball, an url or something for this stuff ? -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
