On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:17:57 -0400 Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > i did? where? :) i am thinking about this still - though right now i think > > Nowhere, it was an eeeeexaggeration to get Gustavo and you > going on this. :) ooooh! drat. so i'm still perfectly sane. DAMN IT! i thought i was going mad! :) > > filters on their own. you could have optimised paths, but as such you > > likely are going to have to render to intermediate buffers, like it or > > not. :) > As to the particulars of this transforms/filters stuff... > well, that one has to use buffers for some things is not an issue. > > Anyway... Since you're still thinking about all this, and > since this has already been discussed at bossa, I'll drop the issue. there is always room for input and discussion. until someone actually knuckles down and starts doing this, discussion is good as it means we will explore all the use cases, corner cases, issues etc. you did bring up the good point of wanting to be able to optimise filter paths and possible merge them (eg a re-color filter than changes contrast for example combined with a rotation filter instead of needing 2 intermediate buffers/stages, merge them if the rotation filter can also change contra while rotating). -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
