On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:05 PM, andres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All ELFs are written in this way, without error checking and reporting, i > think it's for performance reason and I like it :) > > > We can simply modify the function to return 1 on success or 0 on error > > *poker face* > > I see you rational, well measured idea and raise you a loony wiki article: > http://wiki.enlightenment.org/index.php/Edje_Interface_Specification
> In all seriousness if there is love for my idea I commit to implement it. > If there isn't, I will be more than happy with Dave's solution. Their is. It will be a real win if we can just check if an Edje_Object really provide all the needed stuff. We could even improve it as some type of declaration inside the EDC like the html DOCTYPE (In case we want to check during theme creation). So I am definitevely for number 2 (A parser + compiler and welcome .edt inside Edje). It's sound really like a good idea to me. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
