Cedric wrote:
>> In all seriousness if there is love for my idea I commit to implement it.
>> If there isn't, I will be more than happy with Dave's solution.
>>
>
> Their is. It will be a real win if we can just check if an Edje_Object
> really provide all the needed stuff. We could even improve it as some
> type of declaration inside the EDC like the html DOCTYPE (In case we
> want to check during theme creation). So I am definitevely for number
> 2 (A parser + compiler and welcome .edt inside Edje). It's sound
> really like a good idea to me.
>
Rephorm had long ago suggested further introspection abilities
for edje/edc... but no one seemed interested. I've also brought up
before that it may be a good idea to have better knowledge of what
these '.edj' files are meant to be...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
