On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to > leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing > a changelog.in but no changelog. And not distributing the debian/ > directory in the tarball. > > For my own usage (sporadic as it is), this is fine. It would just be an > incredible choore to have to go and recreate all the debian/ directories > by hand. But if the data is in CVS, thats fine. Presumably there aren't > any objections to making (minor) modifications to it such as fixing up > build dependancies. no objections - as long as it doesnt get into dist tarballs - the debian guys are happy :) > Lastly with regards to consistancy and not having different > subdirectories in the tree have different policies. I agree 100% > > -- > Horms > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
