Jorge Luis Zapata Muga schrieb: > > As i said too many times, there was edata, this arguments are refered > to edata, not eina, you can think of eina on just the same > conceptually lib but developed from the base code of edata. So i > wasn't expecting developers on eina, i was expecting them on edata > when i created it, but none appeared, so the excuse of "it was outside > cvs" applies to eina, but im ok with that and never wanted to say the > other thing, what i meant is the "feedback" it has received, as edata > received none, eina also received none, until raster give a "go" and > the license has become an issue, those are facts, not opinions. >
Yes, you weren't the only one how wanted to have a data type lib, but E had a dep-freeze, if you haven't forgot. And it was clear that ecore would have been split after the release of E17. After e_dbus and efreet where added as a direct dep of e17, raster seems to have changed his mind. But that happen some weeks ago. So there wasn't really a reason for a data type lib before. And after that i presented edt as a beginning to put the data types into a single standalone lib. But you insisted that it must be eina. Now I understand why. Before the license discussion I thought it is because of the indentation or the name, why it must be eina and not something else. >> or he may not have bothered to check since everything else is BSD, he >> probably assumed it was BSD. >> > > No, he didnt assumed that. I explicitly sent an email saying my will > about the library when he hadn't commit anything into eina yet, and he > already expressed his will, of not contributing code and not coding on > it, so i took the risk. The thing here is why should i care now (two > years later) for something that others didnt care back then? not > talking on eina directly, but edata as it predecessor. that's what i > argue when answering the consensus mail you sent me, you ask me for > consensus on a project where there is no consensus. > Actually I thought it was BSD licensed. I didn't expect that Trojan horse tactic. Only after Vincent has asked me if it is ok for me to switch to LGPL I realized that i contributed to a proprietary project. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
