Enlightenment SVN schrieb:
> Log:
> Another step toward IPv6 support with more cleanup.
>
> Patch from Arnaud de Turckheim.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2008-10-06 09:40:01 -0700 (Mon, 06 Oct 2008)
> New Revision: 36483
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c
> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_info.c
>
> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c 2008-10-06 15:58:21 UTC (rev
> 36482)
> +++ trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con.c 2008-10-06 16:40:01 UTC (rev
> 36483)
> @@ -26,21 +26,23 @@
> # include <winsock2.h>
> #endif
>
> -static void _ecore_con_cb_dns_lookup(void *data, struct hostent *he);
> -static void _ecore_con_cb_udp_dns_lookup(void *data, struct hostent *he);
> static void _ecore_con_cb_tcp_connect(void *data, Ecore_Con_Netinfo *info);
> static void _ecore_con_cb_udp_connect(void *data, Ecore_Con_Netinfo *info);
> static void _ecore_con_cb_tcp_listen(void *data, Ecore_Con_Netinfo *info);
> static void _ecore_con_cb_udp_listen(void *data, Ecore_Con_Netinfo *info);
> +
> static void _ecore_con_server_free(Ecore_Con_Server *svr);
> static void _ecore_con_client_free(Ecore_Con_Client *cl);
> +
> static int _ecore_con_svr_handler(void *data, Ecore_Fd_Handler *fd_handler);
> static int _ecore_con_cl_handler(void *data, Ecore_Fd_Handler *fd_handler);
> static int _ecore_con_cl_udp_handler(void *data, Ecore_Fd_Handler
> *fd_handler);
> static int _ecore_con_svr_udp_handler(void *data, Ecore_Fd_Handler
> *fd_handler);
> static int _ecore_con_svr_cl_handler(void *data, Ecore_Fd_Handler
> *fd_handler);
> +
> static void _ecore_con_server_flush(Ecore_Con_Server *svr);
> static void _ecore_con_client_flush(Ecore_Con_Client *cl);
> +
> static void _ecore_con_event_client_add_free(void *data, void *ev);
> static void _ecore_con_event_client_del_free(void *data, void *ev);
> static void _ecore_con_event_client_data_free(void *data, void *ev);
> @@ -57,8 +59,25 @@
>
> static Ecore_List *servers = NULL;
> static int init_count = 0;
> +
> #if USE_OPENSSL
> static int ssl_init_count = 0;
> +static int _ecore_con_init_ssl(Ecore_Con_Server *svr);
> +static int _ecore_con_shutdown_ssl(Ecore_Con_Server *svr);
> +static int _ecore_con_free_ssl(Ecore_Con_Server *svr);
> +
> +# define INIT_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_init_ssl(svr)
> +# define SHUTDOWN_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_shutdown_ssl(svr)
> +# define FREE_SSL(svr) _ecore_con_free_ssl(svr)
> +# define UNSET_SSL(svr) \
> + do { \
> + svr->ssl = NULL; \
> + svr->ssl_ctx = NULL; \
> + } while (0);
>
The point of using do {} while(0) in macros, fades away if you append a
semicolon.
> +#else
> +# define INIT_SSL(svr) 0
> +# define SHUTDOWN_SSL(svr) 0
> +# define FREE_SSL(svr) 0
> #endi
I haven't read the full code, but I think you are missing the
UNSET_SSL() for the !OPENSSL case.
Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
