On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kim Woelders wrote:
> If all that's needed is included in the patch I think it's a bit much to have 
> to depend on another (unreleased) library.

on the other hand, it's a windows port, so I don't think that there are 
much people who will compile it. What is expected by Windows users is a 
binary + dll.

By release, you mean a 1.* one ? If so, would you have objections that I 
add Evil as a dependency ? I plan to have an Evil release in some months.

Vincent

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to