On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:02:56 +0200, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kim Woelders wrote: >> If all that's needed is included in the patch I think it's a bit much >> to have >> to depend on another (unreleased) library. > > on the other hand, it's a windows port, so I don't think that there are > much people who will compile it. What is expected by Windows users is a > binary + dll. > > By release, you mean a 1.* one ? Yes, that is what I meant. One that is announced as released, and is maintained and bugfixed. I assume "stable API" is not an issue in this particular case. Anyway, if this only affects windows targets I guess I shouldn't care too much. > If so, would you have objections that I > add Evil as a dependency ? I plan to have an Evil release in some months. > Please do not do this before 1.4.2 out. /Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
