On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:25:15 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Log:
> > hmmm - no. Edje-Vera-Bold is a pointless addition. why? it's not defined
> > anywhere! you would need a fonts {} sectin that maps Edje-Vera-Bold to a
> > .ttf file inlined into the .edj files. We don't included these anymore in
> > the theme. We use the (these days) standard Sans font on the system. the
> > solution to it missing/not working (when a bold style is used) is not
> > adding fallbacks in to fonts that don't exist. I have never seen any
> > problem with this, so those that do should be checking why the Sans and
> > Sans:style=Bold fontconfig font declarations don't work (lack of those
> > fonts on their system? bad fontconfig setup? maybe a bug in evas's
> > fontconfig support?)
>
> missing fontconfig or systems without fonts at all, it's a weird case,
> but happened to me already.
then get fonts... and fontconfig :) the patch was useless as Edje-Vera-Bold
wasn't even defined in the theme at all as a font - and it'd need to be to work.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
