On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Log:
> >> hmmm - no. Edje-Vera-Bold is a pointless addition. why? it's not defined
> >> anywhere! you would need a fonts {} sectin that maps Edje-Vera-Bold to a
> >> .ttf file inlined into the .edj files. We don't included these anymore in
> >> the theme. We use the (these days) standard Sans font on the system. the
> >> solution to it missing/not working (when a bold style is used) is not
> >> adding fallbacks in to fonts that don't exist. I have never seen any
> >> problem with this, so those that do should be checking why the Sans and
> >> Sans:style=Bold fontconfig font declarations don't work (lack of those
> >> fonts on their system? bad fontconfig setup? maybe a bug in evas's
> >> fontconfig support?)
> >
> > missing fontconfig or systems without fonts at all, it's a weird case,
> > but happened to me already.
>
> no fontconfig on Windows CE OS :)
no e17 either... :)
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
