On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:00 -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> quietly behind the scenes we have agreed we need to merge and be 1 - they > >> are > >> close enough in structure and gaols that this is not a technical problem - > >> and > >> it's definitely not a political one. we both very much want a merge. it is > >> simply that both started development in separate pools for separate goals > >> and > >> reasons that they are not the same right now - but this will change, so > >> expect > >> in the future to see a merge. the real questions are more like "what the > >> hell > >> will we do with the api?" ie grn_* vs elm_* ... or will we maintain both > >> or use > >> #defines (for now) to at least keep codebases mostly building with minor > >> changes... > > > > choose one namespace as soon as possible, as they are currently not much > > code using those 2 widgets sets. > > it will be elm, guarana will still exist for non-widget parts (right > now guana_widgets is a sub-library of guarana), includes MVC and other > stuff, eventually we can move more stuff to elementary, but I guess we > can keep like that for now. > Oh, I rather wanted it to be grn_, since it doesn't start with an "e" :)
Also, what kind of widgets would guarana provide? Since you mentioned MVC, would it add tree/list/icon/combo/whatever view widgets? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
