On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to free >> l->data while l is not available anymore. >> >> so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 : free first l->data, then >> remove the list item l. >> >> what do you think ? > > it is still wrong since l->next will be accessed right after that. You > need to move E_FREE() call before list removal and use proper > iteration, might be good use of my EINA_LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(). I've already comitted it. I add a FIXME to say that it's not the correct fix. I don't know how to use EINA_LIST_FOREACH_SAFE(). Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
