On 09:04 Thu 29 Jan     , Toma wrote:
 
> As the top of the page says, we need to finalize the list of things
> TODO.

hi guys,

i'm not the dev so beg your pardon if things below are "out of scope".

1) after the review of a mentioned page
(http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Release)
i decide to fill 'trac' with some more 'tickets'/(requests) instead of
the page modification. assume that it's your (and not mine) decision to
set a milestone to the Release.

2) there're no 'magic' word  we're all aware about (no doubt that it ...
you know...). here it is (in capital letters):
                           == "SYSTRAY" == 
suppose that clear definition of our POV to this case is required. it's 
o'k not to make one and explain why. but Release of a Desktop Shell 
without a tray will attract less Users i guess. yes, Wiki FAQ advise to
use 'trayer', 'stalonetray', etc., but references to the various 
discussions are unable to state the case clear.

3) annoying question related to the "color and font config modules". as
it was mentioned by Raster:

>thats what i meant - just wouldn't compile the color and font config modules.
>they they wont appear anywhere. code will be there - just not being compiled or
>used until its fixed.

ok. but does it mean that all themes/(.edj files) which use custom fonts
and/or "color_class:"-es will require maintenance? if "Yes!", then
suppose that the info should be spread all over the community or only new
default theme will remain usable (it's a nice option, but some may
prefer other variants).

4) another "chewing gum" - "Should add lua support? (optional)" Just
make a decision and say it. No/Yes - doesn't matter much (though the
amount of maintenance if "Yes" will be sufficient). it's a pity that
both VM's ('embryo' and 'lua') can't exist together.

5) last couple of days i'm using 'Ecomorph' and it's much more stable
then "bling" module. suppose that "bling" should be improved (in terms
of stability) or explicitly marked as 'unstable'. yes, FAQ tells that
E17 doesn't work with composite, but it's an easy task for "bling" now
to create a nice segfault of E17 :).

offtop> http://en.opensuse.org/Ecomorph

6) as i mentioned in trac ticket #201 the "gap" exist in a window 
management between E16/eesh and E17/enlightenment_remote. it could be
nice to eliminate this "mismatch" especially for the experienced Users
of E16.

7) the "bridge" between "qt" <-> "edje" && "gtk" <-> "edje" still "under 
heavy discussion" suggest to create a couple of themes like existing 
"Clearlooks" (it's really nice) to match the major ones used by others. 
dunno about "qt" (don't use it here) but it's an easy task to copy a 
couple of most popular "gtk+" ones.


thanks for your kind attention.
regards,
sda

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to