On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:21 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Viktor Kojouharov<vkojouha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:52 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Viktor Kojouharov<vkojouha...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:01 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> I want to move the following projects to BROKEN/OLD as they're one of > >> >> them: > >> >> > >> >> - edje_viewer (edje_player/edje_editor work better) > >> > I don't consider the viewer to be neither broken nor old. I still use > >> > it whenever I need to take a peek at edj files. > >> > >> it's not broken now because I keep fixing it, but really I gave up on > >> it as I'm not using it anymore. All features are present in > >> edje_editor and even more is there. Also, it uses etk and no one is > >> maintaining it (last patches were made by me), I plan to deprecate etk > >> soon, probably after Canola and other pieces (ie: Edje_Editor) moves > >> to Elementary or something else, so the less code we have depending on > >> it, the better. > > I'm planning on moving edje_viewer to elementary, whenever I have some > > spare time to do so. > > don't just port, fix it please! It's broken in a sense one would not > expect, and not the best design ever... for example, the EDJE editor > do not use EDJE, or at least not to the leven one would expect: those > frames around the objects are nasty hand-written evas smart objects! I > was upset when I read its code, really... Edje_Editor is well done > with that regard, if you move it to elementary it would benefit both > viewers and writers, and it should be easier to port! :-) > Those frames have been gone for more than a year. Anyway, Edje_Editor is not my code, and it serves a different purpose.
> > And since when was our policy to deprecate stuff, > > just because there is other stuff in the repository with can present > > similar results? > > because it's unmaintained, not because other projects... and it's more > code to port to new changes, what is bad. > > Again, don't take it too hard, we're moving and not deleting it. It > will just not get as much as "publicity" being at top level, but it > will be good, it will give stuff that work and is maintained more! And > will scare users less, when they look at SVN and see that half of > existing projects are non working or not a good reference to use :-/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
