Hello, All. In message from 20 june 2009 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> a bitmask is almost reasonable... as that limits us to 32 gadget locations > (lets be real. we'll use an int). right now it seems ok, but... in the long > run, i am not so sure. an enum and just check if the is_site returns true > when passed the target location seems expandable enough for me. :) (that'll > give us 4 billion or so locations... i'm happy with that) I don't think that we will have more than 32 sities for gadgets in future. If that happens, then something wrong with GUI... By psychology, human works with 7-9 essencies simultaneously. If we have more, then sharply increase probability of human's error. That's all is my IMHO. :-) Sincerely yours, Sergey. -- Jabber/XMPP: [email protected] Cellular: +7-909-206-5992 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
