On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:18:31 -0500 Nick Hughart <[email protected]> said:
> I'll throw my 2c into the mix. > The current e.org is completely fubar with respect to standards. It > doesn't even contain a doctype. I won't go any further on how much of html does not REQUIRE a doctype. plain html has existed ever since and is STILL valid to this very day. > a pile it is and why being so is causing it to render so poorly in IE. > Btw, why are we using a table with like 30 cells to render a download > button?? Just make an image and put the text on top, problem solved... there is a very good reason. it is simply not possible in html any other way to have a ANY width button with ANY content (label) AND have the edges and corners not be stretched into ugly oblivion. > The dev site seems better (it at least has a doctype and validated > minus 1 simple error), but it's using an HTML doctype. Wake up people, > it's 2009, HTML is DEAD! XHTML has been and will continue to be around and so will html. html is far from dead. > for the foreseeable future. Can't wait until HTML pages just fail to > load in all browsers, good riddance. well.. i did actually fix it. it works now in ie6 (and i presume ie7). i even tested it. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
