On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > Hey, > > eina_mempool_add is not a correct name : it does not add to something a > mempool. > > The problem is that if we change the name to eina_mempool_new, the delete > function should be named eina_mempool_free. And there is already a > eina_mempool_free in eina_inline_mempool.x > > cedric wants to keep the API like that. His arguments are that the code > would be less easier to read, and anyway, we add a mempool. > > i would like to rename eina_mempool_free to eina_mempool_poll_free > (actually, adding pool_ to the 3 functions in eina_inline_mempool.x > > So i would like the opinion of other devs :)
I like your proposal, all the time I have to go to that code I get confused :-P -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
