> > Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any
> > performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL.
>
> using a macro does not involved any performance hit too as PATH_MAX
> is directly replaced by its value before the compilation.
Yes, but it's a damn big performance hit when someone changes one size,
but not the other and the whole thing falls over in a steaming
heap... ;-)
Regards,
nash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
