On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
> >>> Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any >>> performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL. >> >> using a macro does not involved any performance hit too as PATH_MAX >> is directly replaced by its value before the compilation. > > Yes, but it's a damn big performance hit when someone changes one size, > but not the other and the whole thing falls over in a steaming > heap... ;-) if someone changes the size of the buffer without looking how the buffer is used, it should stop coding and try to be cabinetmaker of fisherman Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
