On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:52:36 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<barbi...@profusion.mobi> said:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:45:13 +0100
> > Atton Jonathan <jonathan.at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> And exml is still using ecore_list.
> >
> > Exml should be taken out and shot.
> >
> > It is:
> >        - Unmaintained
> >        - Documentation doesn't match code (see exml_next())
> >        - Essentially unused.
> 
> basically pointless... as what it does is to convert xml to another
> data type. This is very likely to lead to inefficiency as you loop the
> xml nodes to create a list, to return and loop to do something useful.
> 
> The only use exml is a module that uses it to parse xorg keyboard
> files. Quaker said he would convert such to use libxml  directly and
> then exml can be removed or moved to OLD/

sounds good to me.

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to