On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:

>> Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most of usefull modules
>> inside e itself, now it is very difficult to switch off/on some module (you
>> will be forced to rebuild whole e to get just one module additional). If
>> we will provide autofoo scripts with recursive configures, that will
>> allow to fetch and build single module without e itself, while keeping
>> possibility of controlling build options for whole e - will you accept
>> this, or you will say "it may break someday, current scheme is working,
>> let's not change it, as we don't want to test your new scripts"?
>
> thats just nuts! run a configure script per module? do you really want to make
> my build time 20x what they are now? running the configure for a lot of efl
> takes longer than the actual compile - and now run it 70 times for e? no
> thanks. build all the modules always - there is no harm to it. package them
> separately if you want and allow each module to be installed as a package.

I agree with raster. Did you ever try to build gettext ? It takes several 
minutes on linux to just run the configure's. I don't even talk about 
Windows where it takes several dozens of minutes.

Vincent

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to