On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:46:41 +0900 Tom Haste <[email protected]> said:

> Disclaimer: 12 hrs into a wine tour/night on the town. Respondant is
> intoxicated.
> 
> 
> I think its more about reducing the basic package to whats 'needed' by
> the average user. It becomes a grey area because E reaches across a
> broad spectrum of devices... Whats the target user? If we know what
> that is, what should then be in the basic package. I know there is a
> mobile usage camp and a desktop usage camp, which i think is awesome
> :) but i think the user base would be desktop right now. As such, it
> should be more desktop orientated, imho. I know theres a mild push to
> keep the basic tarball on release down to a minimum... (hence my
> recent png squish.)

sure - in theory... it reduces e's package size... but by how much? really?
it's a few kb. no big savings here unless you intend to nuke 50%+ of modules.
this is not a case where you can say a saving really works.

> Toma...
> 
> 
> On 3/20/10, Carsten Haitzler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:33 +0100 Thomas Gstädtner <[email protected]>
> > said:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 17:25, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Tom Haste <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> I agree on this. There are more useful modules to most users in
> >> >> E-MODULES-EXTRAs that would be better suited to the main tarball...
> >> >> like
> >> >> calendar.
> >> >
> >> > Needless to say, I disagree with that.
> >> >
> >> > These are in the same class of "Mixer" or "Illume", they are or will
> >> > be core functionality, even if you do not use them now, you might
> >> > using it really soon as most systems start shipping with bluetooth (as
> >> > it is the case) or 3g modems as lots of netbooks to come. And they are
> >> > being officially included and maintained by me... so blame me at any
> >> > problems, these modules should work, and work well.
> >> >
> >> > What we could do is disable their compilation by default. It would be
> >> > the case for lots of modules, like all of the illume. This is not so
> >> > good because bugs and warnings would not show and thus be fixed
> >> > soon... the way raster likes to manage it :-)
> >> >
> >> > Alternatively, you can just disable these modules --disable-MODULENAME
> >> > to save your build time.
> >>
> >> I think it should stay where it is and currently be built by defau alt.
> >> When the release comes, it should not longer be built by default, so
> >> packagers can chose if they want the features without explicitly
> >> deactivating them (only the other way around). Same goes probably for
> >> most non-trivial and non-shelf modules.
> >
> > why does it matter? these modules build only if edbus has the support. they
> > are
> > not loaded by default. now if edbus has the support - ofono and bluez are
> > built by default - support for them in edbus anyway. and they have no
> > dependencies. same with connman - and hal and notify. they arte there and
> > provide features. building the modules for e is harmless. the real question
> > is... should the be enabled by default, and if so, what default config, if
> > any
> > should they have etc.
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> 


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to