On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 07:47:45 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:56:26 +0800 Tom Haste <tomha...@gmail.com>
> > said:
> >
> >> So...
> >>
> >> We're adding a patch that packagers use to make LUA install
> >> correctly, so wouldnt that make E more difficult to package? Since
> >> its effecting the install of LUA? Its early in the morning here so
> >> it may just be my squishy morning brain not understanding the idea.
> >
> > no no no.. WE are not adding the patch. WE are just assuming the
> > lua install is "sane" (ie provides a .pc file etc.) and expect the
> > installed lua to be patched and set up properly. :)
>
> technically speaking, the problem is the same than zlib or libjpeg,
> and we never complained that they don't have a .pc file. It would be
> easier, of course, to have one (btw, zlib 1.2.4 has one, now. The
> libjpeg maintainer does not want to add one, though)
At least you don't need to patch their Makefile to get dynamic
libraries however.
And Lua _removed_ the .pc that was there.
Regards,
nash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
