On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote: > >> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago. >>>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590. >>> >>> as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm more >>> inclined to add it again to svn. He deleted it by saying a new one will >>> be added soon. 3 months later, nothing. The good thing would have be to >>> add an "entrance2" and do the move *after* the new code is in svn, >>> whatever the status of entrance was. >>> >>> Vincent >>> >> >> Or the other way ... moving 'entrance' to OLD (rather than total removal), >> and start working on entrance2 :) > > same thing, what is important is to not remove the old code before the > new one is in svn
the code was broken and causing more harm than good. Actually it should have been removed way before. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
