On Mon, 31 May 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote: >> >>> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago. >>>>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590. >>>> >>>> as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm more >>>> inclined to add it again to svn. He deleted it by saying a new one will >>>> be added soon. 3 months later, nothing. The good thing would have be to >>>> add an "entrance2" and do the move *after* the new code is in svn, >>>> whatever the status of entrance was. >>>> >>>> Vincent >>>> >>> >>> Or the other way ... moving 'entrance' to OLD (rather than total removal), >>> and start working on entrance2 :) >> >> same thing, what is important is to not remove the old code before the >> new one is in svn > > the code was broken and causing more harm than good. Actually it > should have been removed way before. no, it should have been fixed. And btw, it's strange. I have several reports from users that said that it was working. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
