On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:31:49 +0200 Benjamin Zores <b...@geexbox.org> said:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> wrote: > > On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:28:45 +0200 > > Benjamin Zores <b...@geexbox.org> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> wrote: > >> > >> > If you have time, I'd love to see any benchmarks you can > >> > generate ;-) > >> > >> That is planned as soon as the whole distro is functionnal and when I > >> manage to get my hands on the board. > >> I could however have some tests on N900 but this will involve much > >> more work. I'll let you know ASAP anyhow (probably a 2 weeks). > > > > 2 weeks is fine ;-) Looking forward to it ;-) > > Took me a bit less than 2 weeks actually. > So I managed to run Expedite on my board and seems to have pretty > decent results. > > Attached is a copy of the benchmark scores. > I only did it using software_x11 renderer right now as I still have > issues with GLES renderer (distro/driver issue, not Evas related). > > So, the board is an OMAP3 ARMv7 Cortex-A8 SoC clocked at 720 MHz (IGEPv2 > board). I've been running in 720p with a 32bits framebuffer on Linux 2.6.33.5. > X.Org 1.7.5 is used without composite nor any window/desktop manager > and is running with omapfb_xorg driver. > The system nearly has no processes running (except vital/mandatory > ones) - GeeXboX OS. > All EFLs (including expedite) have been cross-compiled using GCC 4.4.4 > with -O4 -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp. > ELFs are based on r49141, so including the latest ARM NEON optimizations. > > The final Evas score is: > 170.88 , EVAS SPEED (WEIGHTED) > > FYI, I used to ran Expedite (older EFL revision, without latest ARM > optimizations) on OMAP3 TouchBook, > using OpenEmbedded derivated distro, with GLES on Xorg/fbdev driver > (slow as hell) and score used to be around 13 only !! > I remember N900 test results to be higher than what I measured on > Touchbook (but my own tests were much lower than Raster's ones) > but definitely not as high as a 171 score. > > So it definitely seems like a very good improvement. > > Full details in attachment. > > Ben you need to take current evas and run on the other platforms. why? we now weigh results based on a finger-in-the-wind guess at real-life usage. so some tests get a low multiplier, some high in the weighting to produce the final result, BUT... you have a problem. the textblock intl result has rediculous results. you need to watch it render - and my bet is that its not rendering anything there - it's blank. you're missing fonts for other languages (japanese, chinese, korean, arabic, etc. etc.). you cannot really use those results there as one of your tests is actually broken and as a result is tweaking the final number to be totally unrealistic. generally the right thing to do is to compare 2 runs of the same version of expedite (well at least so they both do the weighting and have the same tests) and test-by-test look at it and the relative results per test and take a guess if that particular rendering/display is used much in your apps/usage etc. if not- ignore it. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
