On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:01:43 +0200 Benjamin Zores <b...@geexbox.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Benjamin Zores <b...@geexbox.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> wrote: > > > >> Can you rebuild with it disabled, and try against the non-neonized > >> evas? > >> > >> I just was expecting some better numbers... but without a baseline > >> they are bit meaningless. > > > > Yes, that's planned for tonight. > > So here are the new benchs. > Same board, IGEPv2 @ 720 MHz, using software_x11, without (left) and > with (right) NEON optimizations. Those numbers look about right, and similar improvements to what I have. A couple of regressions I don't have: Not using the gcc args to allow neon slows gcc down by about 1-3%, so neon generally claws that back with substantial interest. > Regarding "Textblock Intl", there used to be an issue because of > Expedite not using right datadir when cross-compiled > that I fixed (and all PNGs, TTFs, fonts.dir and fonts.alias files are > present at the right place according to strace) > but the too-big-to-be-true score remains. Good to see neon improved "crazy performance" to "absolutely absurd performance" ;-) > Anyhow, NEON optimizations add a 30.2% boost. > See http://geexbox.org/~ben/expedite-neon-omap3-igepv2.html Thanks for that. Regards, nash ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
