On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:08:56 +0200
Benjamin Zores <b...@geexbox.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Can you just rebuild evas _without_ neon enabled (you only need to
> > recompile evas, doesn't effect any other library).
>
> > Looking at the ratios to my tests, my feeling is neon isn't working
> > I have to say.
>
> How could that be ?
> If it's compiled in, it's getting use, right ?
There is the --enable-cpu-neon arg to configure, and a run time check.
As long as they both pass, it will use neon.
If you really want to check open one of the _neon files in blend, shove
a printf there and make sure it gets printed (then get rid of it
because your performance will then suck ;-)
> > If only it was that good ;-)
>
> Yeah well, the scores are better than the one I experienced on N900.
> FYI, I've tried expedite on N900 months ago, either with my or Raster
> pre-built EFLs and I had results 5x slower than the one on raster's
> website.
As raster said: Head expedite uses a weighted average.
I think it was mostly to make sure neon doesn't look too good on the
massive speed ups in image blending tests ;-)
Regards,
nash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
