On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:08:06 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> for your consideration....
>
> i changed eet to put Eet.h inside an eet-1 dir - like eian-0 for eina.
> pkg-config etc. is updated so compiles will work. packaging should
> work if it just includes everything in include/* recursively - which
> it should. but let me know what u think. i think we should do this
> for the rest of efl core? also one thing i didn't do is rename eet.pc
> to eet-1.pc - i think this is unnecessary as if there is every an eet
> 2.0 we can make it eet-2.pc then.
My 2cents is:
Yay!
And yes, do it for the rest. I think we can agree that pkg-config is a
requirement for such things. Having to put version numbers of
dependencies in code sucks: Put it in the build system.
Regards,
nash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
