On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:13:18 +0800 Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> said: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:08:06 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > > > for your consideration.... > > > > i changed eet to put Eet.h inside an eet-1 dir - like eian-0 for eina. > > pkg-config etc. is updated so compiles will work. packaging should > > work if it just includes everything in include/* recursively - which > > it should. but let me know what u think. i think we should do this > > for the rest of efl core? also one thing i didn't do is rename eet.pc > > to eet-1.pc - i think this is unnecessary as if there is every an eet > > 2.0 we can make it eet-2.pc then. > > My 2cents is: > Yay! > > And yes, do it for the rest. I think we can agree that pkg-config is a > requirement for such things. Having to put version numbers of > dependencies in code sucks: Put it in the build system.
sure. it allows parallel installs of multiple eet major versions. this should in general do so for all of efl. only thing i am willing to maybe throw up in the air is the eet.pc vs eet-1.pc (we have eina-0.pc right now - and wel that obviously will being eina-1.pc - what should we do here. chaning it to eet-1.pc will mean everything that builds needs changes to adapt. i am happy to wait until eet 2.0 for eet-2.pc - and so on - ans similar for the rest of efl - with eina the exception with eina-1.pc) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel