On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:13:18 +0800 Brett Nash <n...@nash.id.au> said:

> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:08:06 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> 
> > for your consideration....
> > 
> > i changed eet to put Eet.h inside an eet-1 dir - like eian-0 for eina.
> > pkg-config etc. is updated so compiles will work. packaging should
> > work if it just includes everything in include/* recursively - which
> > it should. but let me know what u think. i think we should do this
> > for the rest of efl core? also one thing i didn't do is rename eet.pc
> > to eet-1.pc - i think this is unnecessary as if there is every an eet
> > 2.0 we can make it eet-2.pc then.
> 
> My 2cents is:
>       Yay!
> 
> And yes, do it for the rest.  I think we can agree that pkg-config is a
> requirement for such things.  Having to put version numbers of
> dependencies in code sucks: Put it in the build system.

sure.  it allows parallel installs of multiple eet major versions. this should
in general do so for all of efl. only thing i am willing to maybe throw up in
the air is the eet.pc vs eet-1.pc (we have eina-0.pc right now - and wel that
obviously will being eina-1.pc - what should we do here. chaning it to eet-1.pc
will mean everything that builds needs changes to adapt. i am happy to wait
until eet 2.0 for eet-2.pc - and so on - ans similar for the rest of efl -
with eina the exception with eina-1.pc)


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to