On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:20:34 +0200, Michael Jennings <m...@kainx.org> wrote:

> On Monday, 09 August 2010, at 22:27:00 (+0200),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
>> I was thinking something like the attached patch.
>
> Looks good to me.  Would you mind committing?
>
>> Then I found XA_CLIPBOARD(Xdisplay). Assuming we have X11/Xmu/Atoms.h,
>> which I think practically always is true, XA_CLIPBOARD(Xdisplay) will
>> refer to the "CLIPBOARD" atom in screen.c (used in IS_SELECTION()) where
>> X11/Xmu/Atoms.h is included before screen.h, whereas
>> XA_CLIPBOARD(Xdisplay) will refer to the "PRIMARY" atom in script.c and
>> term.c due to definition in screen.h.
>> It is of course simple to add props[PROP_CLIPBOARD] too, but I'm not  
>> sure
>> what the intended behavior is.
>
> The automated behavior should always interact with PRIMARY.  The only
> way Eterm should ever touch CLIPBOARD is if a script directly
> references it.  This is due to the fact that Eterm's copy is always
> implicit (again, outside of a script).
>
> If you have time, feel free to add the clipboard props as well. :)
>
Ok, done :)

As per commit message this causes a few changes. I guess the change is  
good in script.c, not sure about term.c.

/Kim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to