On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:19 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
> <mj.mccorm...@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Come on guys.
> >
> > The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
> > SVN.
> 
> No, I object because it's a huge change that might introduce bugs. The
> fact is that this feature freeze is taking longer than most of us
> desired.
> 
> What we can do is settle the remaining issues (who knows them?) and release 
> 1.0.
> 
> > This is a tweak on fixes that have been put in by others in the last few
> > days.
> > If you object to this, please read the SVN commits list and object to the
> > other
> > patches in the same area.
> 
> Currently I don't have time to follow all commits, but people is
> indeed committing more than should be allowed.

Exactly. I have a bunch of features I can shove in that will be just
fine and will probably not introduce bugs, but that's not how a feature
freeze works... A freeze is a freeze and we should respect that as such.

I hope we'll release soon and this freeze hell will be over.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to