On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Brett Nash wrote:
> >> sure, as i mentioned them when i compiled with suncc. Otherwise, with gcc, >> from >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options >> >> "-Wpointer-arith >> Warn about anything that depends on the .size of. a function type or >> of void. GNU C assigns these types a size of 1, for convenience in >> calculations with void * pointers and pointers to functions. In C++, warn >> also when an arithmetic operation involves NULL. This warning is also >> enabled by -pedantic." >> >> so not enabled with one of your flags. > > Now that is strange. > > I swear that used to part of -Wextra, although the documentation > indicates I am mistaken (a couple of 4's and 3's checked there). > > I personally despise that gcc extension. that could be a good reason to add flags in configure.ac. If gcc keeps changing the flags enabled by -Wall, -W, -Wextra and others in the different version of gcc, adding them directly in the autotools will be safer. I don't understand why raster is so reluctant in having them. Especially if we enable them only during a development cycle, and not in a release. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
