On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Brett Nash wrote: > >> >>> sure, as i mentioned them when i compiled with suncc. Otherwise, with gcc, >>> from >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options >>> >>> "-Wpointer-arith >>> Warn about anything that depends on the .size of. a function type or >>> of void. GNU C assigns these types a size of 1, for convenience in >>> calculations with void * pointers and pointers to functions. In C++, warn >>> also when an arithmetic operation involves NULL. This warning is also >>> enabled by -pedantic." >>> >>> so not enabled with one of your flags. >> >> Now that is strange. >> >> I swear that used to part of -Wextra, although the documentation >> indicates I am mistaken (a couple of 4's and 3's checked there). >> >> I personally despise that gcc extension. > > that could be a good reason to add flags in configure.ac. If gcc keeps > changing the flags enabled by -Wall, -W, -Wextra and others in the > different version of gcc, adding them directly in the autotools will be > safer. > > I don't understand why raster is so reluctant in having them. Especially > if we enable them only during a development cycle, and not in a release.
Indeed... several projects I work with enable tons of -W when configured with --enable-maintainer-mode (even -Werror). I don't see a point against doing this. Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
