Well, questions is, do we need another script? Out there are a whole lot, linked on exchange, e.g. So i don't see a real sense in creating another script. Why not spend time on developing efl instead of scripting bash stuff...? Don't get me wrong, i'm not pushing easy_e17, i just see no sense in keeping everything always in svn, as least not a build script. Also we're recreating the wheel again and again... Kind regards, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 06:26:08PM +0100, Dave Andreoli wrote: > 2010/12/20 Rafael Fonseca <rfons...@profusion.mobi>: > >> Also: are you going to support this script? This kind of stuff will be > >> outdated in a short time... > >> > >> I'm telling this because I tryed to do the same (with reasy) and I > >> fault. I marked my script as deprecatd on my site last week, because > >> keeping it 'on-sync' is a too-heavy task (change in our svn and change > >> in distro package make reasy outdated every 4 months) > > > > The idea to put it in svn was to make it easier to keep it updated > > since more people can contribute to it. > > > >> also I really dont like the way you store installed stuff in different > >> directories based on REV. This can cause > >> more problems IMO. > >> Don't get me wrong, I really think we need such a script in SVN and be > >> it the offical way to install EFL+E17, > >> but we need to discuss the way we want the script to work. > > > > Well, it is not a personal script so it can be modified at will. And > > if you guys think it does not fit the source tree, take it off. I > > won't send ninjas after you because of that ;) > > I dont want to remove the script from svn, but I would like if we could > discuss > it's feature. > Your script lacks a lot of functionality (present in easy_e17 and > reasy), so we need > to make your script better. As I told you (and also Tom agree) the > FOLDER-SVNREV > is crazy: I compile the whole stuff once a week and frequently only > just some pkgs, > so that feature really hurt me. > > Can you remove that? or at least make it optionable? > After that I will be more than happy to help (discuss&code) on your > script, it need lots > of work! > > NOTE: I will send ninja after you if you don't agree :D > > DaveMDS > > > -- > > Rafael Fonseca > > ProFUSION embedded systems > > http://www.profusion.mobi > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of > Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even > within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: > an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your > browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
