On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100
Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu:
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can
> >>> be used later on to generate the changelog (over interval or check per
> >>> commit).
> >>>
> >>> e.g.:
> >>> CHANGELOG: added foo to bar
> >>
> >> This seems pretty reasonable!
> >
> > Do people not write the appropriate ChangeLog entries with their commits
> > because they are too lazy or because they just forget to do so?
> >
> > If they are too lazy, the CHANGELOG: thing might help; OTOH, if they
> > just forget to do that, why would they remember to add the CHANGELOG:
> > tag?
> 
> Agreed, I tend to forget, not a lazyness issue. At least for me.
+1 forgetting

-- 
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world? 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to