On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:31:12 +0100 > Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[email protected]> writes: >>>> Em 04-02-2011 11:34, Leif Middelschulte escreveu: >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> a couple of days ago I proposed a tag within commit message, which can >>>>> be used later on to generate the changelog (over interval or check per >>>>> commit). >>>>> >>>>> e.g.: >>>>> CHANGELOG: added foo to bar >>>> >>>> This seems pretty reasonable! >>> >>> Do people not write the appropriate ChangeLog entries with their commits >>> because they are too lazy or because they just forget to do so? >>> >>> If they are too lazy, the CHANGELOG: thing might help; OTOH, if they >>> just forget to do that, why would they remember to add the CHANGELOG: >>> tag? >> >> Agreed, I tend to forget, not a lazyness issue. At least for me. > +1 forgetting even if i said a lot of stuff about ChangeLog, my mail was not only for that. For me, it's about better code committed. That's exactly what raster does with most of the patches by samsung, btw. He looks at them and commit them with changes, fixes, improvements, etc... Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these rules translate into the virtual world? http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
