> Once 1,0.1 or 1.1 is released it would be cool to know also what version
> of things like python-efl, editje and elementary is compatible with it.

Yeah, this might be needed :)
+1

Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)


On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Mika Laitio <lam...@pilppa.org> wrote:
>>> But 1.0.1 should be in place, basic testing (I did none) should be
>>> enough as they should be only bug fixes.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Grr, don't change the subject, I don't care about a 1.0, I want a 1.1 :)
>>
>> Though while we are at it: yeah, we should probably release 1.0.1 as well.
>
> Once 1,0.1 or 1.1 is released it would be cool to know also what version
> of things like python-efl, editje and elementary is compatible with it.
>
> Once I build 1.0 efl it took me a while to bisect an older version from
> those that was was buildable. (newer version seemed to require also a
> never version of efl)
>
> Mika
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
> What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
> Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
> to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to